Effect of smartphone use on cervical spine stability.

Using a smartphone often involves a sustained head-forward tilt posture, which may deteriorate the mechanism of muscle reaction efficiency or reduce the stiffness of connective tissues of the cervical spine. These changes in muscular and connective tissues can impair cervical spine stability and contribute to developing neck pain symptoms. In this experiment, change in the cervical spine stability associated with a sustained smartphone use posture was evaluated by quantifying the effective stiffness and the reflexive responses of the head to sudden perturbations. Seventeen young smartphone users maintained their heads tilted forward approximately 30° for 30 min while watching videos on their smartphones in sitting. Data show that the measures of cervical spine stability did not change significantly after the smartphone use task despite developing mild to moderate neck and upper body discomfort symptoms. Study findings imply that keeping the head tilt posture for 30 min for smartphone use did not significantly alter spinal stability, rejecting its association with neck discomfort.

Comparing spinal loads in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation with and without chronic low back pain: An EMG-informed approach.

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA), likely due in part to biomechanical factors. Here, three-dimensional full-body kinematics and kinetics during level-ground walking, at a self-selected and three controlled speeds (1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 m/s), were collected from twenty-one persons with unilateral transtibial LLA, with (n = 9) and without cLBP (n = 12). Peak compressive, mediolateral, and anteroposterior L5-S1 spinal loads were estimated from a full-body, transtibial amputation-specific OpenSim model and compared between groups. Predicted lumbar joint torques from muscle activations were compared to inverse dynamics and predicted and measured electromyographic muscle activations were compared for model evaluation and verification. There were no group differences in compressive or anterior shear forces (p > 0.466). During intact stance, peak ipsilateral loads increased with speed to a greater extent in the cLBP group vs. no cLBP group (p=0.023), while during prosthetic stance, peak contralateral loads were larger in the no cLBP group (p=0.047) and increased to a greater extent with walking speed compared to the cLBP group (p=0.008). During intact stance, intact side external obliques had higher activations in the no cLBP group (p=0.039), and internal obliques had higher activations in the cLBP group at faster walking speeds compared to the no cLBP group. Predicted muscle activations demonstrated similar activation patterns to electromyographic-measured activations (r = 0.56-0.96), and error between inverse dynamics and simulated spinal moments was low (0.08 Nm RMS error). Persons with transtibial LLA and cLBP may adopt movement strategies during walking to reduce mediolateral shear forces at the L5-S1 joint, particularly as walking speed increases. However, future work is needed to understand the time course from pain onset to chronification and the cumulative influence of increased spinal loads over time.

Effect of low back pain on the kinetics and kinematics of the lumbar spine - a combined in vivo and in silico investigation.

Lifting is a significant risk factor for low back pain (LBP). Different biomechanical factors including spinal loads, kinematics, and muscle electromyography (EMG) activities have previously been investigated during lifting activities in LBP patients and asymptomatic individuals to identify their association with LBP. However, the findings were contradictory and inconclusive. Accurate and subject-specific prediction of spinal loads is crucial for understanding, diagnosing, planning tailored treatments, and preventing recurrent pain in LBP patients. Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate the L5-S1 compressive and resultant shear loads in 19 healthy and 17 non-specific chronic LBP individuals during various static load-holding tasks (holding a 10 kg box at hip, chest, and head height) using full-body and personalized musculoskeletal models driven by subject-specific in vivo kinematic/kinetic, EMG, and physiological cross-sectional areas (PCSAs) data. These biomechanical characteristics were concurrently analyzed to identify potential differences between the two groups. Statistical analyses showed that LBP had almost no significant effect on the range of motion (trunk, lumbar, pelvis), PCSA, and EMG. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the predicted L5-S1 loads. However, as the task became more demanding, by elevating the hand-load from hip to head, LBP patients experienced significant increases in both compressive (33 %, p = 0.00) and shear (25 %, p = 0.02) loads, while asymptomatic individuals showed significant increases only in compressive loads (30 %, p = 0.01). This suggests that engaging in more challenging activities could potentially magnify the effect of LBP on the biomechanical factors and increase their discrimination capacity between LBP and asymptomatic individuals.

Evaluation of ground reaction forces and centers of pressure predicted by AnyBody Modeling System during load reaching/handling activities and effects of the prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads.

Full-body and lower-extremity human musculoskeletal models require feet ground reaction forces (GRFs) and centers of pressure (CoPs) as inputs to predict muscle forces and joint loads. GRFs/CoPs are traditionally measured via floor-mounted forceplates that are usually restricted to research laboratories thus limiting their applicability in real occupational and clinical setups. Alternatively, GRFs/CoPs can be estimated via inverse dynamic approaches as also implemented in the Anybody Modeling System (AnyBody Technology, Aalborg, Denmark). The accuracy of Anybody in estimating GRFs/CoPs during load-handling/reaching activities and the effect of its prediction errors on model-estimated spinal loads remain to be investigated. Twelve normal- and over-weight individuals performed total of 480 static load-handling/reaching activities while measuring (by forceplates) and predicting (by AnyBody) their GRFs/CoPs. Moreover, the effects of GRF/CoP prediction errors on the estimated spinal loads were evaluated by inputting measured or predicted GRFs/CoPs into subject-specific musculoskeletal models. Regardless of the subject groups (normal-weight or overweight) and tasks (load-reaching or load-handling), results indicated great agreements between the measured and predicted GRFs (normalized root-mean-squared error, nRMSEs < 14% and R2 > 0.90) and between their model-estimated spinal loads (nRMSEs < 14% and R2 > 0.83). These agreements were good but relatively less satisfactory for CoPs (nRMSEs < 17% and 0.57 < R2 < 0.68). The only exception, requiring a more throughout investigation, was the situation when the ground-foot contact was significantly reduced during the activity. It appears that occupational/clinical investigations performed in real workstation/clinical setups with no access to forceplates may benefit from the AnyBody GRF/CoP prediction tools for a wide range of load-reaching/handling activities.

Electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models with time-varying fatigue dynamics improve lumbosacral joint moments during lifting.

Muscle fatigue is prevalent across different aspects of daily life. Tracking muscle fatigue is useful to understand muscle overuse and possible risk of injury leading to musculoskeletal disorders. Current fatigue models are not suitable for real-world settings as they are either validated using simulations or non-functional tasks. Moreover, models that capture the changes to muscle activity due to fatigue either assume a linear relationship between muscle activity and muscle force or utilize a simple muscle model. Personalised electromygraphy (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal models (pEMS) offer person-specific approaches to model muscle and joint kinetics during a wide repertoire of daily life tasks. These models utilize EMG, thus capturing central fatigue-dependent changes in multi-muscle bio-electrical activity. However, the peripheral muscle force decay is missing in these models. Thus, we studied the influence of fatigue on a large scale pEMS of the trunk. Eleven healthy participants performed functional asymmetric lifting task. Average peak body-weight normalized lumbosacral moments (BW-LM) were estimated to be 2.55 ± 0.26 Nm/kg by reference inverse dynamics. After complete exhaustion of the lower back, the pEMS overestimated the peak BW-LM by 0.64 ± 0.37 Nm/kg. Then, we developed a time-varying muscle force decay model resulting in a time-varying pEMS (t-pEMS). This reduced the difference between BW-LM estimated by the t-pEMS and reference to 0.49 ± 0.14 Nm/kg. We also showed that five fatiguing contractions are sufficient to calibrate the t-pEMS. Thus, this study presents a person and muscle specific model to track fatigue during functional tasks.

Vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals during walking.

Evoking muscle responses by electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) may help to understand the contribution of the vestibular system to postural control. Although paraspinal muscles play a role in postural stability, the vestibulo-muscular coupling of these muscles during walking has rarely been studied. This study aimed to investigate how vestibular signals affect paraspinal muscle activity at different vertebral levels during walking with preferred and narrow step width. Sixteen healthy participants were recruited. Participants walked on a treadmill for 8 min at 78 steps/min and 2.8 km/h, at two different step width, either with or without EVS. Bipolar electromyography was recorded bilaterally from the paraspinal muscles at eight vertebral levels from cervical to lumbar. Coherence, gain, and delay of EVS and EMG responses were determined. Significant EVS-EMG coupling (P < 0.01) was found at ipsilateral and/or contralateral heel strikes. This coupling was mirrored between left and right relative to the midline of the trunk and between the higher and lower vertebral levels, i.e. a peak occurred at ipsilateral heel strike at lower levels, whereas it occurred at contralateral heel strike at higher levels. EVS-EMG coupling only partially coincided with peak muscle activity. EVS-EMG coherence slightly, but not significantly, increased when walking with narrow steps. No significant differences were found in gain and phase between the vertebral levels or step width conditions. In summary, vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals might allow a fast, synchronized, and spatially co-ordinated response along the trunk during walking. KEY POINTS: Mediolateral stabilization of gait requires an estimate of the state of the body, which is affected by vestibular afference. During gait, the heavy trunk segment is controlled by phasic paraspinal muscle activity and in rodents the medial and lateral vestibulospinal tracts activate these muscles. To gain insight in vestibulospinal connections in humans and their role in gait, we recorded paraspinal surface EMG of cervical to lumbar paraspinal muscles, and characterized coherence, gain and delay between EMG and electrical vestibular stimulation, during slow walking. Vestibular stimulation caused phasic, vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity at delays of around 40 ms, which was mirrored between left, lower and right, upper vertebral levels. Our results indicate that vestibular afference causes fast, synchronized, and spatially co-ordinated responses of the paraspinal muscles along the trunk, that simultaneously contribute to stabilizing the centre of mass trajectory and to keeping the head upright.

Effect of personalized spinal profile on its biomechanical response in an EMG-assisted optimization musculoskeletal model of the trunk.

Recent developments in musculoskeletal (MS) modeling have been geared towards model customization. Personalization of the spine profile could affect estimates of spinal loading and stability, particularly in the upright standing posture where large inter-subject variations in the lumbar lordosis have been reported. This study investigates the biomechanical consequences of changes in the spinal profile. In 31 participants (healthy and with back pain), (1) the spine external profile was measured, (2) submaximal contractions were recorded in a dynamometer to calibrate the EMG-driven MS model and finally (3) static lifting in the upright standing challenging spine stability while altering load position and magnitude were considered. EMG signals of 12 trunk muscles and angular kinematics of 17 segments were recorded. For each participant, the MS model was constructed using either a generic or a personalized spinal profile and 17 biomechanical outcomes were computed, including individual muscle forces, ratios of muscle group forces, spinal loading and stability parameters. According to the ANOVA results and corresponding effect sizes, personalizing the spine profile induced medium and large effects on about half MS model outcomes related to the trunk muscle forces and negligible to small effects on spinal loading and stability as more aggregate outcomes. These effects are explained by personalized spine profiles that were a little more in extension as well as more pronounced spine curvatures (lordosis and kyphosis). These findings suggest that spine profile personalization should be considered in MS spine modeling as it may impact muscle force prediction and spinal loading.

Small Female Occupant Response in Reclined and Upright Seated Postures in Frontal Impacts.

The objective of this study was to compare the kinematics of the head-neck, torso, pelvis, and lower extremities and document injuries and their patterns to small female occupants in frontal impacts with upright and reclined postures using an experimental model. Six postmortem human surrogates (PMHS) with a mean stature of 154 ± 9.0 cm and mass of 49 ± 12 kg were equally divided between upright and reclined groups (seatback: 25 deg and 45 deg), restrained by a three-point integrated belt, positioned on a semirigid seat, and exposed to low and moderate crash velocities (15 km/h and 32 km/h respectively). The response between the upright and reclined postures was similar in magnitude and curve morphology. While none of the differences were statistically significant, the thoracic spine demonstrated increased downward (+Z) displacement, and the head demonstrated an increased horizontal (+X) displacement for the reclined occupants. In contrast, the upright occupants showed a slightly increased downward (+Z) displacement at the head, but the torso displaced primarily along the +X direction. The posture angles between the two groups were similar at the pelvis and different at the thorax and head. At 32 km/h, both cohorts exhibited multiple rib failure, with upright specimens having a greater number of severe fractures. Although MAIS was the same in both groups, the upright specimens had more bi-cortical rib fractures, suggesting the potential for pneumothorax. This preliminary study may be useful in validating physical (ATDs) and computational (HBMs) surrogates.

Comparative evaluation of different spinal stability metrics.

Direct in vivo measurements of spinal stability are not possible, leaving computational estimations (such as dynamic time series and structural analyses) as the feasible option. However, differences between different stability assessment approaches and metrics remain unclear. To explore this, we asked 32 participants to perform 35 cycles of repetitive lifts with and without load (4/2.6 kg for males/females). EMG signals and 3D kinematics were collected via 12 surface electrodes and 17 inertial sensors, and three dynamical stability measures were computed: short and long temporal and conventional maximum Lyapunov exponents (LyE) and maximum Floquet multipliers (FM). A dynamic subject-specific EMG-assisted musculoskeletal model computed four structural stability measures (critical muscle stiffness coefficient at which spine becomes unstable, average spine stiffness, minimum and geometric average of Hessian matrix eigenvalues). Across cycles, dynamical and structural stability outcomes varied noticeably. Temporal short-term LyE and all structural stability measures were more influenced by the cycle percentage (posture factor) than by phase (lifting, lowering) or load factor. The effect of all factors were non-significant for FM and long LyE, except for the posture on LyE-L with a small effect size. Pearson's correlations revealed a weak to moderate, or non-existent, correlation between structural and dynamical stability metrics, with small shared variances, underscoring their distinct and independent nature and theoretical foundations. Moreover, the low sensitivity of dynamic measures to posture and load factors, found in this study, calls for further examination. Considering the limitations and shortcomings of both dynamical and structural stability assessment approaches, there is a need for the development of improved musculoskeletal stability evaluation techniques.

Effect of strengthening and weakening of abdominal and dorsal muscles on lumbar spine loads in parents of disabled children.

Pain in the lower part of the back is one of the most common chronic illnesses globally. This work aimed to determine the impact of the reinforcement of particular groups of abdominal and dorsal muscles on the loads exerted on the lumbar section of the spine in 30 mothers of children with motor disabilities. An optical Ariel Performance Analysis System recorded and processed the kinematics data of everyday activities. Tests investigating the effects of the strengthening or weakening of abdominal and dorsal muscles on loading in the lumbar section of the spine utilized the AnyBody Modelling System. Input data for the simulations included mean values of body positions, while the effects of strengthening or weakening of muscles were simulated in the muscle forces model by introducing different values for muscle physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA). Simulations used decreasing or increasing PCSA values of abdominal muscles and the erector spinae. The analysis involved component and resultant force values on the lumbosacral joint (L5-S1) of the spine and intra-abdominal pressure values. The highest reduction of the resultant reaction value in L5-S1 was observed in the simulations that increased the PCSA of the transverse abdominal (TrA). Indeed, a double increase in the TrA cross-section caused a reduction of the resultant reaction in L5-S1 by 30% and the anterior-posterior and proximal-distal forces by approximately 20-30%. Increased PCSA of the erector spinae exerted higher loads on the spine. These results indicate that strengthening weakened abdominal muscles, particularly TrA, in parents of children with motor disabilities reduces lower spinal loads during daily activities.

Effect of obesity on spinal loads during load-reaching activities: A subject- and kinematics-specific musculoskeletal modeling approach.

Obesity has been associated to increase the risk of low back disorders. Previous musculoskeletal models simulating the effect of body weight on intervertebral joint loads have assumed identical body postures for obese and normal-weight individuals during a given physical activity. Our recent kinematic-measurement studies, however, indicate that obese individuals adapt different body postures (segmental orientations) than normal-weight ones when performing load-reaching activities. The present study, therefore, used a subject- and kinematics-specific musculoskeletal modeling approach to compare spinal loads of nine normal-weight and nine obese individuals each performing twelve static two-handed load-reaching activities at different hand heights, anterior distances, and asymmetry angles (total of 12 tasks × 18 subjects = 216 model simulations). Each model incorporated personalized muscle architectures, body mass distributions, and full-body kinematics for each subject and task. Results indicated that even when accounting for subject-specific body kinematics obese individuals experienced significantly larger (by âˆ¼38% in average) L5-S1 compression (2305 ± 468 N versus 1674 ± 337 N) and shear (508 ± 111 N versus 705 ± 150 N) loads during all reaching activities (p < 0.05 for all hand positions). This average difference of âˆ¼38% was similar to the results obtained from previous modeling investigations that neglected kinematics differences between the two weight groups. Moreover, there was no significant interaction effect between body weight and hand position on the spinal loads; indicating that the effect of body weight on L5-S1 loads was not dependent on the position of hands. Postural differences alone appear, hence, ineffective in compensating the greater spinal loads that obese people experience during reaching activities.

Dependence of trunk muscle size and position on age, height, and weight in a multi-ethnic cohort of middle-aged and older men and women.

Trunk muscle size and location relative to the spine are key factors affecting their capacity to assist in trunk movement, strength, and function. There remains limited information on how age, weight and height affect these measurements across multiple spinal levels, and prior studies had limited samples in terms of size and ethnicity. In this study, we measured trunk muscles in coronal plane slices at T4 - L4 of CT scans acquired in 507 participants, aged 40-90 years, from the community-based Framingham Heart Study. Mixed-effects linear regressions, stratified by sex, determined the contributions of age, height and weight, to muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), the distance from the vertebral body centroid (CD), and the in-plane angle of the line between the vertebral body and the muscle centroids (CA). Muscle CSA decreased with higher age by an average of -0.8% per year, but weight (average 0.8% per kg) and height (average -0.05% per cm) had mixed results, with both positive and negative effects depending on muscle group and level. Muscle CD increased with weight by an average of 0.3% per kg, but had mixed effects for age (average 0.8% per year) and height (average 0.1% per cm). Muscle CA had mixed associations with age (average 0.05% per year), weight (average 0.01% per kg) and height (average -0.05% per cm). A prediction program created with these results provides a simple approach for estimating probable values for trunk muscle size and position in the absence of medical imaging.

Sagittal kinematics and imbalance of the spine and whole body during walking in late-onset Pompe disease.

Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is characterized by postural abnormalities mainly due to involvement of paraspinal lumbar and abdominal-pelvic muscles. Previous studies quantitatively analyzed static upright posture, spatial-temporal parameters, and kinematics of the lower limbs and trunk, considered as single bone segment. Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and whole body during walking has never been investigated in patients with LOPD. The aim of the study was to evaluate sagittal kinematics and imbalance of the spine and whole body in patients with LOPD by three-dimensional (3-D)-motion analysis using an appropriate marker set protocol and introducing innovative kinematic parameters. Seven siblings with LOPD were assessed by 3-D-stereophotogrammetry using the DB-total protocol, which allows to analyze sagittal alignment of whole body. Fourteen age- and sex-matched healthy subjects were used as controls. LOPD group showed a flattening of the spinal curvatures, with a head and neck posteriorization with respect to sacrum, a significant increase of concavity in Heel-S2-Nasion/C7 angles, a rear-position of upper limbs with respect to pelvis, a shorter pendular activity, and a trend of elbow extension during ambulation. Moreover, a significant increase of excursion range in most of sagittal parameters was found. The present study highlighted a specific pathological postural pattern, resembling "man falling backwards," which reveals a biomechanical compensation strategy of patients with LOPD to maintain the balance against the instability of the spinopelvic region, kinematically verified by increase of the excursion ranges. DB-total kinematic parameters might be useful for functional evaluation and for monitoring response to enzyme replacement therapy, rehabilitation project, and disease progression.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to quantitatively characterize the sagittal spine and whole body posture of patients with late-onset Pompe disease during walking, showing a pathological kinematic pattern defined "man falling backwards." 3-D-motion analysis, with a specific marker set (DB-total protocol) introducing new whole body kinematic parameters, may be useful for accurate functional evaluation and monitoring this rare disease.

Trunk stability in fatiguing frequency-dependent lifting activities.

BACKGROUND: Work-related low-back disorders (WLBDs) are one of the most frequent and costly musculoskeletal conditions. It has been showed that WLBDs may occur when intervertebral or torso equilibrium is altered by a biomechanical perturbations or neuromuscular control error. The capacity to react to such disturbances is heavily determined by the spinal stability, provided by active and passive tissues and controlled by the central nervous system. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to investigate trunk stability through the Lyapunov's maximum exponent during repetitive liftings in relation to risk level, as well as to evaluate its ability to discriminate these risk levels. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers performed fatiguing lifting tasks at three different frequencies corresponding to low, medium, and high risk levels according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) equation. We investigated changes in spinal stability during fatiguing lifting tasks at different risk levels using the maximum Lyapunov's index (λMax) computed from trunk accelerations recorded by placing three IMUs at pelvis, lower and upper spine levels. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to determine if there was any significant effect on λMax among the three risk levels and the time (start, mid, and end of the task). Additionally, we examined the Pearson's correlation of λMax with the trunk muscle co-activation, computed from trunk sEMG. RESULTS: Our findings show an increase in trunk stability with increasing risk level and as the lifting task progressed over time. A negative correlation between λMax and trunk co-activation was observed which illustrates that the increase in spinal stability could be partially attributed to increased trunk muscle co-activation. SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the possibility of generating stability measures from kinematic data as risk assessment features in fatiguing tasks which may prove useful to detect the risk of developing work-related low back pain disorders and allow the implementation of early ergonomic interventions.

Applying a homogeneous pressure distribution to the upper vertebral endplate: Validation of a new loading system, pilot application to human vertebral bodies, and finite element predictions of DIC measured displacements and strains.

Image-based personalized Finite Element Models (pFEM) could detect alterations in physiological deformation of human vertebral bodies, but their accuracy has been seldom reported. Meaningful validation experiments should allow vertebral endplate deformability and ensure well-controlled boundary conditions. This study aimed to (i) validate a new loading system to apply a homogeneous pressure on the vertebral endplate during vertebral body compression regardless of endplate deformation; (ii) perform a pilot study on human vertebral bodies measuring surface displacements and strains with Digital Image Correlation (DIC); (iii) determine the accuracy of pFEM of the vertebral bodies. Homogeneous pressure application was achieved by pressurizing a fluid silicone encased in a rubber silicone film acting on the cranial endplate. The loading system was validated by comparing DIC-measured longitudinal strains and lower-end contact pressures, measured on three homogeneous pseudovertebrae of constant transversal section at 2.0 kN, against theoretically calculated values. Longitudinal strains and contact pressures were rather homogeneous, and their mean values close to theoretical calculations (5% underestimation). DIC measurements of surface longitudinal and circumferential displacements and strains were obtained on three human vertebral bodies at 2.0 kN. Complete displacement and strain maps were achieved for anterolateral aspects with random errors ≤0.2 µm and ≤30 µstrain, respectively. Venous plexus and double curvatures limited the completeness and accuracy of DIC data in posterior aspects. pFEM of vertebral bodies, including cortical bone mapping, were built from computed tomography images. In anterolateral aspects, pFEM accuracy of the three vertebrae was: (i) comparable to literature in terms of longitudinal displacements (R2>0.8); (ii) extended to circumferential displacements (pooled data: R2>0.9) and longitudinal strains (zero median error, 95% error: <27%). Circumferential strains were overestimated (median error: 39%). The new methods presented may permit to study how physiological and pathologic conditions influence the ability of vertebral endplates/bodies to sustain loads.

Trunk muscle forces and spinal loads during heavy deadlift: Effects of personalization, muscle wrapping, muscle lever arm, and lumbopelvic rhythm.

Heavy deadlift is used as a physical fitness screening tool in the U.S. Army. Despite the relevance of such a screening tool to military tasks performed by Service Members, the biomechanical impact of heavy deadlift and its risk of low-back injury remain unknown. A kinematics-driven musculoskeletal model of spine was implemented to investigate biomechanics of the lower back in a volunteer (23 years old, height of 1.82 m, and body mass of 98.8 kg) during a 68 kg deadlift. In search of protective mechanisms, effects of model personalization and variations in trunk musculature and lumbopelvic rhythm were also investigated. The net moment, compression and shear forces at the L5-S1 reached peaks of 684 Nm, 17.2 and 4.2 kN, respectively. Geometrical personalization and changes in lumbopelvic rhythm had the least effects on predictions while increases in muscle moment arms (40%) had the largest effects that caused, respectively, 32% and 36% decrease in the maximum compressive and shearing forces. Initiating wrapping of back muscles at farther distances from the spine had opposing effects on spinal loads; peak compression at the L5-S1 decreased by 12% whereas shear increased by 19%. Despite mechanisms considered, spinal loads during heavy deadlift exceed the existing evidence concerning the threshold of injury for spinal segments, suggesting the vulnerability to injury. Chronic exposure to such high-spinal loads may lead to (micro) fractures, degeneration, pathoanatomical changes and finally low-back pain.

Reaching an understanding of cortico-medullary control of forelimb behaviors.

How the neocortex modulates hindbrain and spinal circuits is of fundamental interest for understanding motor control and adaptive behaviors. New work from Yang, Kanodia, and Arber demonstrates that there is an exquisite anatomical organization and functional modulation from the anterior (motor) cortex on downstream medulla populations during forelimb behaviors in mice.

Effect of Active Muscles on Astronaut Kinematics and Injury Risk for Piloted Lunar Landing and Launch While Standing.

While astronauts may pilot future lunar landers in a standing posture, the response of the human body under lunar launch and landing-related dynamic loading conditions is not well understood. It is important to consider the effects of active muscles under these loading conditions as muscles stabilize posture while standing. In the present study, astronaut response for a piloted lunar mission in a standing posture was simulated using an active human body model (HBM) with a closed-loop joint-angle based proportional integral derivative controller muscle activation strategy and compared with a passive HBM to understand the effects of active muscles on astronaut body kinematics and injury risk. While head, neck, and lumbar spine injury risk were relatively unaffected by active muscles, the lower extremity injury risk and the head and arm kinematics were significantly changed. Active muscle prevented knee-buckling and spinal slouching and lowered tibia injury risk in the active vs. passive model (revised tibia index: 0.02-0.40 vs. 0.01-0.58; acceptable tolerance: 0.43). Head displacement was higher in the active vs. passive model (11.6 vs. 9.0 cm forward, 6.3 vs. 7.0 cm backward, 7.9 vs. 7.3 cm downward, 3.7 vs. 2.4 cm lateral). Lower arm movement was seen with the active vs. passive model (23 vs. 35 cm backward, 12 vs. 20 cm downward). Overall simulations suggest that the passive model may overpredict injury risk in astronauts for spaceflight loading conditions, which can be improved using the model with active musculature.

Estimating lumbar spine loading when using back-support exoskeletons in lifting tasks.

Low-back pain (LBP) continues as the leading cause of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, and the high LBP burden is attributed largely to physical risk factors prevalent in manual material handling tasks. Industrial back-support exoskeletons (BSEs) are a promising ergonomic intervention to help control/prevent exposures to such risk factors. While earlier research has demonstrated beneficial effects of BSEs in terms of reductions in superficial back muscle activity, limited evidence is available regarding the impacts of these devices on spine loads. We evaluated the effects of two passive BSEs (BackX™ AC and Laevo™ V2.5) on lumbosacral compression and shear forces during repetitive lifting using an optimization-based model. Eighteen participants (gender-balanced) completed four minutes of repetitive lifting in nine different conditions, involving symmetric and asymmetric postures when using the BSEs (along with no BSE as a control condition). Using both BSEs reduced estimated peak compression and anteroposterior shear forces (by ∼8-15%). Such reductions, however, were task-specific and depended on the BSE design. Laevo™ use reduced mediolateral shear forces during asymmetric lifting (by ∼35%). We also found that reductions in composite measures of trunk muscle activity may not correspond well with changes in spine forces when using a BSE. These results can help guide the proper selection and application of BSEs during repetitive lifting tasks. Future work is recommended to explore the viability of different biomechanical models to assess changes in spine mechanical loads when using BSEs and whether reasonable estimates would be obtained using such models.

Effects of cycling on the morphology and spinal posture in professional and recreational cyclists: a systematic review.

The aim was to know if cycling affects spinal morphology in postures off the bicycle, such as adapting the spinal curvatures on the bicycle depending on the handlebar type and position on the handlebars. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The studies selected met the following criteria: a) the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal (experimental or cohorts); b) the study evaluated the sagittal morphology of the spine on the bicycle; c) the study included healthy and trained participants without injuries or cyclists reporting low back pain. Fifteen studies reported that a greater pelvic tilt was observed that when the handlebar was in a lower position. Sixteen studies found that lumbar kyphosis was greater when the handlebar grip was lower and farther from the saddle. Twelve studies reported that a tendency towards greater thoracic flexion as the time spent pedalling on the bicycle increased. In conclusion, the practice of cycling produces adaptations in the morphology of the spine of the cyclist compared to non-cyclists, such as an increase in pelvic tilt and a greater capacity for lumbar flexion in trunk flexion positions, and a greater thoracic kyphosis in the standing position.